Beach v. Bello
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
This is an action of assumpsit on a promissory-note against two defendants who are sued as joint makers. In the superior court, the trial justice, at the conclusion of the evidence, directed the jury to return a verdict for the plaintiff against both defendants for $2626.88, the amount claimed to be due on the note. To this action, to rulings made during the trial excluding evidence, and to the refusal of the trial justice to permit the filing of a certain plea, the defendant Paolan»tonio has prosecuted his bill of exceptions to this- court.
All these exceptions involve substantially the same…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pitt v. LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Baldwin v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Tisdel v. Central Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1931
- Bank of the United States v. ManheimNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Gannon v. BronstonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pontus v. PaivaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1938