Legal Opinion
Hurley Gasoline Co. v. Johnson Oil Ref. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 23, 1926No. 16433PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUTH, C.
Parties will be here referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
The plaintiff placed the following order with defendant:
“5 tank ears — -78-82 gravity, water white, sweet odor, absorption gasoline, 350 end point or lower, 10 lbs. vapor tension or under 85-00 recovery.”
“Price 1114 per gallon £. •&. b. group 3 Okla. Terms 1%-10 das^s.”
“Outage, color and gravity guaranteed at destination.”
The destination was Waiverly Oil Works, Pittsburgh, Pa. This order was accepted by defendant under the terms of the order. Plaintiff alleges defendant delivered two cars according to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pope v. AllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Boothby v. ScalesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. WareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Columbian Iron Works & Dry Dock Co. v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
- Brown v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sunray DX Oil Co. v. Great Lakes Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Consolidated Pipe Line Co. v. British American Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Pioneer Engineering Works, Inc. v. McConnellMontana Supreme Court · 1949
- Sunray DX Oil Co. v. Great Lakes Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970