Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Krinsky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 3, 1997PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 21, 1995, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
Claimant, a head bank teller, became an employee of Astoria Federal Savings Bank after claimant’s former employer and Astoria Bank (hereinafter the employer) merged. Approximately two weeks after the merger, claimant’s employer placed her on probation for three months due to various incidents of insubordination and unprofessional leadership style.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of MielewskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re the Claim of CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re the Claim of ChickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re the Claim of IkoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim of KleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of HarpuleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim of ShabbirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.