Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 24, 1997PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 19,1996, which, *940upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

After nine years of employment as a steno-secretary, claimant resigned due to stress caused by the nonchallenging nature of her job duties and the fact that her skills were not being utilized. We conclude that substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of KrinskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re the Claim of MelitoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. In re the Claim of BishopAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of NevilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. In re the Claim of OrlikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. In re the Claim of OrlikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. In re the Claim of LonczynskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. In re the Claim of MercierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API