Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Klein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 3, 2003PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 26, 2002, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Approximately two weeks after starting her job as a service coordinator for the employer, claimant quit contending that the fumes at work were making her ill. Although claimant mentioned her condition to her son’s allergist who told her to stay away from the fumes, she admitted that she did not consult her doctor. In the absence of any medical…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of KrinskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re the Claim of FumiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. In re the Claim of EhrenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of BingelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re the Claim of CulpAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re the Claim of DingmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. In re the Claim of DingmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. In re the Claim of JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API