Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Ikoli
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 9, 1998PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a. decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 31, 1996, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.
After two years of working for the same supervisor, claimant resigned from his position as a documentary examiner for a bank, claiming that continual harassment and pressure regarding his work adversely affected his health. We conclude that substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualifying claimant…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re the Claim of KrinskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim of MielewskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re the Claim of RainvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of SpauldingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of RuballoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of SteatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of GraysonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.