Legal Opinion

State v. Mangum

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided December 12, 2013No. 20120346-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Decision

2Per curiam

{1 Jamie Nichole Mangum appeals from her conviction of aggravated assault, a third degree felony, Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-108 (LexisNexis 2008).1 We affirm.

12 Mangum asserts that the evidence was insufficient to establish that she used a dangerous weapon and stabbed the victim (Victim) in the back. In reviewing a jury verdict, an appellate court looks at the evidence and all reasonable inferences to be drawn in the light most favorable to the verdict. State v. Fedorowicz, 2002 UT 67, ¶ 40, 52 P.3d 1194. Additionally, appellate courts will generally not reevaluate the credibility of…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. WorkmanUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. FedorowiczUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. HutchingsUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. GardnerUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. LuceroCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Layton City v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  2. United States v. FagateleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. FagateleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API