State v. Mangum
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Decision
2Per curiam
{1 Jamie Nichole Mangum appeals from her conviction of aggravated assault, a third degree felony, Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-108 (LexisNexis 2008).1 We affirm.
12 Mangum asserts that the evidence was insufficient to establish that she used a dangerous weapon and stabbed the victim (Victim) in the back. In reviewing a jury verdict, an appellate court looks at the evidence and all reasonable inferences to be drawn in the light most favorable to the verdict. State v. Fedorowicz, 2002 UT 67, ¶ 40, 52 P.3d 1194. Additionally, appellate courts will generally not reevaluate the credibility of…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. WorkmanUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. FedorowiczUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. HutchingsUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. GardnerUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. LuceroCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Layton City v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- United States v. FagateleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. FagateleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019