Layton City v. Carr
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHRISTIANSEN, Judge:
11 Jacque Zachary Carr appeals from his convictions for domestic-violence assault and commission of domestic violence in the presence of a child. Carr argues that Layton City did not introduce sufficient evidence to support his conviction for domestic-violence assault and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
12 The victim in this case (AP.) was sleeping at home when Carr, who was living with her at the time, returned home from work some time after midnight. 2 Carr found AP.'s cell phone and looked through her text messages,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- State v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
- State v. BeckeringCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
- State v. WhytockCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- State v. MakayaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- State v. CraftCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.