Legal Opinion

State v. Lucero

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 19, 2012No. 20100444-CAPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

ROTH, Judge:

{1 Defendant Jacob Ronald Lucero appeals his convictions for assault, see Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-102 (2008), aggravated assault, see id. § 76-5-103 (current version at id. (Supp. 2011)), failure to stop at the command of a law enforcement officer, see id. § 76-8-305.5, and interference with an arresting officer, see id. § 76-8-305. We affirm.

12 Lucero challenges his convictions on the basis that there was insufficient evidence from which the jury could find him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. "We will reverse a jury conviction for insufficient evidence only…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. WorkmanUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. KnollUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. WattsUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. DoyleCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  3. State v. GranadosCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  4. Department of Human Services v. J. M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API