State v. Maxfield
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McFADDEN, Chief Justice.
Defendant-respondent Cyrus Maxfield is a naturopathic physician, 1 charged by information with four counts of practicing medicine without a license. In a “Motion to Dismiss or Quash Information and Complaint,” Maxfield sought to have the applicable statute, I.C. § 54-1803, declared unconstitutionally vague. The trial court granted the motion and the state has appealed. We reverse.
After a preliminary hearing, defendant was bound over to the district court on four counts of practicing without a license and one count of illegal possession of a controlled substance with…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Shaw v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- State v. ArmstrongIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
- Davis v. BeelerTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
- Aitchison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- Hitchcock v. CollenbergDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. KelloggIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
- Maxfield v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. KelloggIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Maxfield v. ThomasDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1983
- BOARD OF DENTISTRY, ETC. v. ClarkIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.