Legal Opinion

State v. Maxfield

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1977No. 12026PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Chief Justice.

Defendant-respondent Cyrus Maxfield is a naturopathic physician, 1 charged by information with four counts of practicing medicine without a license. In a “Motion to Dismiss or Quash Information and Complaint,” Maxfield sought to have the applicable statute, I.C. § 54-1803, declared unconstitutionally vague. The trial court granted the motion and the state has appealed. We reverse.

After a preliminary hearing, defendant was bound over to the district court on four counts of practicing without a license and one count of illegal possession of a controlled substance with…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. State v. ArmstrongIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Davis v. BeelerTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Aitchison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  5. Hitchcock v. CollenbergDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. KelloggIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Maxfield v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. State v. KelloggIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Maxfield v. ThomasDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1983
  5. BOARD OF DENTISTRY, ETC. v. ClarkIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API