Legal Opinion
Hitchcock v. Collenberg
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 19, 1956No. Civ. 7866PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, District Judge.
The Court of Appeals of Maryland has held that naturopathic practitioners are “practicing medicine”, as that term is defined in the State Medical Practice Act, Annotated Code of Maryland, 1951 ed., Art. 43, Secs. 117-147, and that a person desiring to engage in the healing art by the practice of naturopathy may not do so without a license from one of the two State Boards of Medical Examiners. Aitchison v. State, 204 Md. 538, 105 A.2d 495, certiorari denied 348 U.S. 880, 75 S.Ct. 116, 99 L.Ed. 692.
The complaint in the instant case is filed by Dr. Kenneth C. Hitchcock, a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Watson v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. Arizona Mines Supply Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1971
- Jerry R. England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Hitchcock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Allstate Insurance Company v. LanierCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- Hahn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.