Commonwealth v. Templin
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Justice CASTILLE.
This Court granted discretionary pretrial review of a suppression ruling to determine and elucidate the proper standard for evaluating a claim that a confession made after an explicit Miranda 1 waiver was rendered involuntary because it followed upon a promise by police to recommend ROR bail 2 in the event the suspect was arrested and arraigned. The suppression court excluded the confession in this case, focusing exclusively upon the fact of the post-waiver promise, which it deemed an “improper inducement” that “require[d] suppression of the statement.” In…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SepulvedaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. YandamuriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. HunzerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. McCreeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.