Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Templin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 2002No. 48 M.D. Appeal Docket 2000PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Justice CASTILLE.

This Court granted discretionary pretrial review of a suppression ruling to determine and elucidate the proper standard for evaluating a claim that a confession made after an explicit Miranda 1 waiver was rendered involuntary because it followed upon a promise by police to recommend ROR bail 2 in the event the suspect was arrested and arraigned. The suppression court excluded the confession in this case, focusing exclusively upon the fact of the post-waiver promise, which it deemed an “improper inducement” that “require[d] suppression of the statement.” In…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SepulvedaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. YandamuriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Commonwealth v. HunzerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. McCreeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API