Legal Opinion
Pierce Associates, Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 13, 2006No. CIV.A.04-1906(JDB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BATES, District Judge.
Pending before the Court in this insurance-coverage dispute are cross-motions for partial summary judgment. Resolution of the motions turns on whether the terms of a commercial general liability policy imposed on the insurer, St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. (“St.Paul”), a duty to continue to defend the interests of an insured, Pierce Associates, Inc. (“Pierce”), in litigation after the insured was dismissed from the suit but where the insured’s conduct remained at issue and the insured’s surety, Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. (“Liberty”), was still a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Seaboard Surety Co. v. Gillette Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Rapid-American Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Fitzpatrick v. American Honda Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. Home Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Driscoll's, Inc. v. California Berry Cultivars, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Pierce Associates, Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006