Dowood Co. v. Michigan Tool Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBeer, J.
The two cases consolidated here for appeal present a single question relating to the scope of examination on oral deposition. Plaintiffs are the Dowood Company and two of its officers.
In May, 1966, defendant sold a swimming pool additive called “Swim Gem” to Dowood for resale to retailers and consumers to be used in sanitizing swimming pools and foot baths. Plaintiffs claim that a quantity of this product was stored on their premises on June 5, 1966, when, in the middle of the night, without witnesses present, a fire started. Subsequently these actions were instituted for the recovery of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gall v. Union Ice CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Wight v. H. G. Christman Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Savage v. Peterson Distributing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1967
- Freed v. SimonMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Branch v. KlattMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Maerz v. United States Steel Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Alberto v. Toyota Motor Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2010