Legal Opinion

Dowood Co. v. Michigan Tool Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 1968No. Docket 3,383PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeer, J.

The two cases consolidated here for appeal present a single question relating to the scope of examination on oral deposition. Plaintiffs are the Dowood Company and two of its officers.

In May, 1966, defendant sold a swimming pool additive called “Swim Gem” to Dowood for resale to retailers and consumers to be used in sanitizing swimming pools and foot baths. Plaintiffs claim that a quantity of this product was stored on their premises on June 5, 1966, when, in the middle of the night, without witnesses present, a fire started. Subsequently these actions were instituted for the recovery of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gall v. Union Ice CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Wight v. H. G. Christman Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Savage v. Peterson Distributing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Freed v. SimonMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Branch v. KlattMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maerz v. United States Steel Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Alberto v. Toyota Motor Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API