Freed v. Simon

Plaintiff-appellant’s stated question No. 1 has been duly accepted by defendant-appellee. See section 1 of former Court Rule No 68 (1945), now GCR 1963, 814.1. Our decision is that such stated question should be answered in the affirmative and that the appealed judgment for defendant-appellee must be reversed for prejudicial rejection of admissible testimony.

The question sufficiently indicates the nature of the case, plaintiff’s proffer of rejected testimony, and the trial judge’s ruling thereon. It reads:

“In an action to recover damages for injuries received as a result of a fall through a…