Legal Opinion

Sterling H. Nickens v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 19, 1963No. 17735PublishedCited by 127 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURGER, Circuit Judge.

Appellant seeks review of his conviction for possession, sale and importation of narcotics in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 4704(a) and 4705(a) and 21 U.S.C. § 174. He was given concurrent sentences on the three counts. Appeal was allowed at gov-érnment expense pursuant to Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 82 S.Ct. 917, 8 L.Ed.2d 21 (1962).

The offenses which are the basis of appellant’s conviction were committed on September 25, 1961. A complaint was filed and the arrest warrant was issued by the Commissioner on May 10, 1962. The arrest warrant was served on appellant…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by127 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Howard Ross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  3. People v. ArcherdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. United States v. Richard T. FordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. Seymour Pollack, United States of America v. Paul M. Sachs, United States of America v. William CuddCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API