Bergfeld v. Unimin Corp.
District Court, N.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MICHAEL J. MELLOY, Circuit Judge,
sitting by designation.
Before the court is defendant 1 Lockheed-Martin Corporation’s motion for summary judgment on all counts of plaintiffs Roger and Denice Bergfeld’s first amended and substituted complaint. Oral arguments were held on December 17, 2001, regarding all pending motions. Count I of plaintiffs’ complaint claims a failure to warn, Count II claims strict liability, Count III claims negligence, and Count IV claims loss of consortium. For the following reasons, defendant Lockheed-Martin’s motion for summary judgment on all counts is granted.
STAN…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Goodbar v. Whitehead Bros.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1984
- Strong v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gerald Johnson v. Mike MoodyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Haase v. Badger Mining Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- Feirson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Gray v. Badger Mining Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Kelly v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2021