Legal Opinion
Feirson v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 29, 2005No. CIV.A. 01-0905(JDB)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Sgt. Bruce and Mary Ann Feirson bring this action against the District of Columbia (“the District”) and Michelle Smith-Jefferies, M.D. (“Dr. Smith-Jefferies”), Taunya Brownlee, M.D. (“Dr. Brownlee”), and Craig Throne, M.D. (“Dr. Thorne”) (collectively “physician defen dants”) 1 for injuries suffered by Sgt. Feir-son during an “attack exercise” as part of his training as a District of Columbia police officer. Presently before the Court are the physician defendants’ motions for summary judgment on Sgt. Feirson’s claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lashawn A. v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Howard University v. BestDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Homan v. GoyalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Feirson v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Gilbert v. MiodovnikDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Gonzalez v. Department of LaborDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Feirson v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Gilbert v. MiodovnikDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.