Legal Opinion

Gray v. Badger Mining Corp.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 15, 2003No. C4-02-2052PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GORDON W. SHUMAKER, Judge.

Respondent Lawrence Gray developed silicosis and sued appellant Badger Mining Corporation and various other defendants in this personal-injury action. He claimed that the defendants were negligent and strictly liable for failing to warn him of the dangers of breathing silica dust, and that the defendants breached warranties of merchantability and fitness for intended purpose. After the district court denied the defendants’ motions for summary judgment, all defendants settled with Gray, except Badger.

Badger renewed its motion for summary judgment on the legal…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Beale v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  2. Germann v. F.L. Smithe MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Goodbar v. Whitehead Bros.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1984
  4. Balder v. HaleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Mulder v. Parke Davis & CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gray v. Badger Mining Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Conwed Corp. v. Union Carbide Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API