Satz v. Koplow

CHIPMAN, Judge.

Defendant-appellant Arnold Satz appeals from a jury verdict in the Marion Superior Court holding him liable under plaintiff-ap-pellee Leonard Koplow’s suit for malicious prosecution. Satz essentially challenges the sufficiency of the evidence on two elements of the malicious prosecution tort, the admission of pleadings from the underlying suit, the giving of an instruction and the amount of damages. We find no error and affirm.

FACTS

The facts most favorable to appellee Kop-low are as follows: Satz and Koplow were merchants who had adjacent stores at 38th and Meridian Streets in…