Legal Opinion

Placer Mining Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 25, 2011No. 01-27Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

Plaintiff seeks compensation under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution for the alleged taking of its property. Currently before the court are defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs cross-motion for partial summary judgment, both pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). The motions are fully briefed and we heard oral argument on April 4, 2011. For the reasons explained below, we deny both motions.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND 1

This case concerns a mining operation in a mountainous region of northern…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API