Legal Opinion

Scarborough v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1978No. B-7157PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL, Justice.

The question presented by this case involves the right to benefits under a medical insurance policy.

Gail Scarborough’s husband was included in a group accident and health insurance policy issued through his employer by Aet-na Life Insurance Company. The policy provided comprehensive medical benefits for Mrs. Scarborough as a member of an insured employee’s family. The medical coverage was limited by a continuing treatment exclusion which provided in part:

If, at the time a family member becomes insured under this Title, he has received treatment for a condition resulting from a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Order of United Commercial Travelers v. ShaneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  2. International Travelers' Ass'n v. YatesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  3. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Co. v. HutsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  4. Zeh v. National Hospital Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. McKay v. Bankers Life CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rowntree v. HunsuckerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hunsucker v. RowntreeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Hardester v. Lincoln National Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1994
  4. Mannino v. Agway, Inc. Group TrustAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Van Volkenburg v. Continental Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API