Scarborough v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DANIEL, Justice.
The question presented by this case involves the right to benefits under a medical insurance policy.
Gail Scarborough’s husband was included in a group accident and health insurance policy issued through his employer by Aet-na Life Insurance Company. The policy provided comprehensive medical benefits for Mrs. Scarborough as a member of an insured employee’s family. The medical coverage was limited by a continuing treatment exclusion which provided in part:
If, at the time a family member becomes insured under this Title, he has received treatment for a condition resulting from a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Order of United Commercial Travelers v. ShaneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- International Travelers' Ass'n v. YatesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Provident Life and Accident Insurance Co. v. HutsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Zeh v. National Hospital Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- McKay v. Bankers Life CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rowntree v. HunsuckerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Hunsucker v. RowntreeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Hardester v. Lincoln National Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1994
- Mannino v. Agway, Inc. Group TrustAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Van Volkenburg v. Continental Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.