Legal Opinion

Hunsucker v. Rowntree

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 6, 1991No. 6-90-086-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLEIL, Justice.

John and Penelope Hunsucker appeal from an adverse summary judgment rendered in their medical malpractice suit against Robert Rowntree, M.D. The critical inquiry concerns whether evidence of Rowntree’s prescription of medication to *780Penelope Hunsucker can constitute evidence of continued medical treatment. We hold that it can and reverse the summary judgment.

Penelope Hunsucker first sought treatment from Rowntree, a physician who specializes in internal medicine, on October 4, 1985. Rowntree examined her and prescribed Sectral, a medication for high blood pressure.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Delgado v. BurnsTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Wilcox v. St. Mary's University of San Antonio, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Kimball v. BrothersTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Baubles & Beads v. Louis Vuitton, S.A.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rowntree v. HunsuckerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Chambers v. ConawayTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Gifford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  4. COVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM v. Barnett, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
  5. COVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM v. Barnett, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API