Horrigan v. Wyman
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ionia. (Smith, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The plaintiff brought suit to recover upon a promissory note made December 3, 1886, by the *122defendant to one William S. Moore, for the sum of $300, with interest at 7 per cent., and due October 15, 1888.
The defense made was that the note in question was obtained from Moore, the owner, by one Roberts, in some fraudulent or surreptitious manner, not very fully explained, in February or March, 1887; that shortly thereafter Moore gave notice . to the defendant that the note had been obtained of him by fraud and duress, and without consideration, and that he (Moore) would hold defendant responsible…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matthews v. PoythressSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
- Paton v. CoitMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
- Lange v. PerleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Union National Bank v. BarberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
- Barnes v. PeetMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bowles v. OakmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Dunn v. National BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
- Twaddle v. MendenhallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Stouffer v. FletcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Johnson County Savings Bank v. GreggSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.