Legal Opinion

Dunn v. National Bank

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1898PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Lincoln county. Hon. Joseph W. Jones, Judge. Action by Frank Dunn against the National Bank of Canton, to recover upon a certificate of deposit, in which J. A. Keller intervened. From a judgment on a verdict directed in favor . of plaintiff, and from an order denying a, new trial, defendant and intervener appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, P. J.

This is an action upon a certificate of deposit, which is in words and figures as follows: “National Bank of Canton. S695. Canton, South Dakota, Mar. 8, 1895. J. A. Keller has deposited in this bank six hundred ninety-five and no-100 dollars, payable to the order of himself on the return of this certificate properly indorsed; interest at 7 per cent, per annum, if left 12 months. No interest after 12 months. P. H. Bacon, Pt. No. 1,384. Not subject to check.” The plaintiff claimed as indorsee of the said certificate. The defendant, in its answer, set up that one J. A. Keller was the real owner…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Manistee National Bank v. SeymourMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Coffey v. GreenfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. People v. DeeganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Landauer v. Sioux Falls Imp. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Taylor v. Bank of VolgaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jerke v. Delmont State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Wolff v. StengerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  3. McGill v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Lyle v. BarnesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Westphal v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API