Lange v. Perley
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Muskegon. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, C. J.
In 18Y0 and whilst serving a regular term as treasurer for Musliee-on county the defendant Perley was *354again elected for the regular term ensuing, and in January, 1871, the plaintiff Lange joined with others as his sureties in his official bond for such second term. In May, 1872, he was found a defaulter to a large amount, and the county instituted a suit on the bond and Perley offered no defense and was defaulted. Subsequently and during the pendency of the suit he assigned all his property to Smith and Hacldey, two of the sureties, for the benefit of his creditors. He set up a claim that the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Britton v. . LorenzNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Guild v. ButlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Alderman v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1857
- Landrum v. Trowbridge, Dwight & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
- Whiting v. . BarneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Christiansen v. HilberMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Sayre v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Ferris v. Home Life Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Jakoboski v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Horrigan v. WymanMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.