Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Billman
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided October 30, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Foley, S.
Certain of the legatees have moved for a reargument of my decision on the question of construction of the will (N. Y. *335L. J. Aug. 8, 1940, p. 312) in order to permit them to submit extrinsic evidence and be heard on the argument. The parties interested in the question have agreed upon a written stipulation of facts and have consented to submit the matter upon the agreed facts and briefs without further hearing.
The motion for reargument has, in effect, been granted for the reason that the surrogate has carefully considered all of the facts submitted as well as the extensive briefs of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- New York Life Insurance & Trust Co. v. WinthropNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- In Re the Will of BumpNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- In re the Estate of WeissmannNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
- Weed v. London & Lancashire Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Reid v. . NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bottomley v. BottomleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
- Estate of BrunetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Freyermuth v. SpeckterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Turner & LoehfelmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941