Robinson v. Jones
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Associate Judge:
Appellants Jack, Thomas and William Robinson (trading as Monarch Novelty Co.) appeal from a judgment holding that appel-lees were legally disabled within the meaning of D.C.Code 1973, § 47-1003, 1 and therefore were entitled to an extension of one year after removal of the disability, in which to redeem their home from appellants who had purchased it at a tax sale. Since the record clearly shows that appel-lees presented evidence from which “legal disability” could be adduced, we affirm.
Appellees Tyree Jones and Susie Moore are brother and sister, who, as joint tenants,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nelson-Bey v. RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bingham v. Goldberg. Marchesano. Kohlman. Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Oxendine v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- J.H. Westerman Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Markowitz v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Bowler v. JoynerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.