Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Jones

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 1981No. 79-1228, 80-247PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Associate Judge:

Appellants Jack, Thomas and William Robinson (trading as Monarch Novelty Co.) appeal from a judgment holding that appel-lees were legally disabled within the meaning of D.C.Code 1973, § 47-1003, 1 and therefore were entitled to an extension of one year after removal of the disability, in which to redeem their home from appellants who had purchased it at a tax sale. Since the record clearly shows that appel-lees presented evidence from which “legal disability” could be adduced, we affirm.

Appellees Tyree Jones and Susie Moore are brother and sister, who, as joint tenants,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nelson-Bey v. RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bingham v. Goldberg. Marchesano. Kohlman. Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Oxendine v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. J.H. Westerman Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Markowitz v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Bowler v. JoynerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API