Legal Opinion
Bowler v. Joyner
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 24, 1989No. 87-1499, 88-67PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
The trial judge awarded Joseph D. Bowler, appellant-cross-appellee (Appellant), $179 in damages for conversion of his personal property by Pamela Joyner, Betty Mae Joyner, and Larry Joyner (Appellees). Appellant contends that the trial judge’s findings were clearly erroneous in failing to reflect the uncontroverted value of the property which appellees converted. Ap-pellees cross-appeal on the ground that the trial judge’s findings of conversion of valuable property were unsupported by the evidence. We remand for further proceedings on the issue of damages; otherwise we affirm.
I
This…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Edmund J. Flynn Co. v. LaVayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Romer v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Duggan v. KetoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Shea v. FridleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia v. VossoughiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- B. J. Bucheit, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. The Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority, Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Maalouf v. ButtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Sabre International Security v. Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions, LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.