Legal Opinion
Freedman v. Suntrust Banks, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 21, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-1575PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge
Presently before the Court is Defendants’ [14] Motion to Dismiss For Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Plaintiffs [24] Motion for Leave to File Limited Surreply. Upon consideration of the pleadings, 1 the relevant legal authorities, and the record as a whole, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and DENIES Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Pile Limited Surreply. For the reasons described herein, the Court finds that it lacks personal jurisdiction over Defendants and that jurisdictional discovery is not warranted but…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Bigelow v. Tom Garrett & Tom Garrett for Cong.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Sonterra Capital Master Fund Ltd. v. Credit Suisse Group AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Doe v. Chiquita Brands Int'l, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Arora v. Buckhead Family Dentistry, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Brit Uw, Limited v. Manhattan Beachwear, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.