Legal Opinion
Brit Uw, Limited v. Manhattan Beachwear, LLC
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 26, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-0523PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
Granting Dependant’s Motion to Dismiss
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Brit UW, Limited (Brit) seeks declaratory relief to establish that it need not pay Defendant Manhattan Beachwear, LLC (MBW) under a professional liability insurance policy that ' Brit provided. MBW’s involvement in this controversy began when it retained Clyde Hettrick, a partner at Dickstein Shapiro LLP (Dick-stein), to represent it in an insurance matter. During-the representation, Mr. Het-trick left Dickstein to form his own firm, and took MBW with him as a…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lewis v. Full Sail, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Afiniti, Ltd. v. ChishtiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Gligorov v. Nation of BruneiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Gold v. Global Aerospace Underwriting Managers, Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Merchia v. Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.