Legal Opinion
Hein v. Arkansas State University
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided July 30, 1997No. J-C-95-218PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
STEPHEN M. REASONER, Chief Judge.
Pending before the Court is defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. Num.31). For the reasons hereinafter stated, the Motion is granted.
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS
Plaintiff, Germmaine Hein, is a citizen of the nation of Uruguay. Ms. Hein was born in Uruguay and moved to Bearing Springs, Michigan on August 18, 1991. Sometime during 1991, the plaintiff married Rudolf Hein. At the time of the marriage Mr. Hein was also a citizen of Uruguay and had been admitted to the United States on a permanent immigrant visa. The plaintiff, however, was admitted to the…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2007
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2002
- Prasad v. HensonDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2022