Legal Opinion

Muse v. Town of Lexington

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1903PublishedCited by 6 opinions

FROM HENDERSON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Henderson County. — A. G. Hawkins, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Beard

The bill in this case was filed by resident taxpayers of the town of Lexington, Tenn., to have certain bonds which were issued in the name of that town declared void for illegality in their issuance and to enjoin the further collection of taxes to pay interest on them.

Among the defendants are the town of Lexington and the St. Louis Trust Company, a corporation chartered under the laws of the State of Missouri, as well as other owners and holders of these bonds.

In the year 1889 certain persons living in the town of Lexington undertook to incorporate the territory embracing it into a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Shields v. Clifton Hill Land Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Comanche County v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Jameson v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
  5. City of Atchison v. ButcherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1865

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Roberts v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
  2. Red River Furnace Co. v. Tennessee Central RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Baker v. MilamTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Rood v. Water Dist. No. 24 of King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry Co. v. Rhea CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API