Legal Opinion

Baker v. Milam

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1950PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tomlinson

By a resolution adopted at its July 1946 term, the Decatur County Quarterly ‘Court directed the issuance *56of $50,000.00 of those school bonds contemplated by Chapter 60 of the Act of 1911, code commencing at Section 25-57, for the purpose of building a school at Parsons. At the time of the passage of this resolution the amount of bonds which could be issued under this statute was limited to 3% of the value of the taxable property of the county, Code, Section 2567.

Shortly thereafter certain taxpayers of Decatur County filed their bill in this suit for the purpose of enjoining the County Judge…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  2. State Ex Rel. Bales v. Hamilton CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Town of McMinnville v. CurtisTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Chapman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
  5. Soukup v. SellTennessee Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. Shelby CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Brentwood Liquors Corp. of Williamson Cty. v. FoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Board of Ed. of Memphis City Schools v. Shelby CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Cagle v. McCanlessTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  5. State v. Mayor of DyersburgTennessee Supreme Court · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API