Legal Opinion

Rood v. Water Dist. No. 24 of King County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1935No. 25731. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This action was brought April 18, 1935, by C. F. Rood, a property owner in the water district involved, for judgment declaring that all proceedings organizing the district are invalid; that certain warrants issued from December 31, 1929, to April 30, 1932, in the sum of $242.12, in favor of defendant J. A. Walloch, be declared void; that all acts of the commissioners of the district be declared to be nullities, and that the commissioners of the district be permanently restrained from all further proceedings as such commissioners.

The merits of the controversy, as presented here, are shown by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cole v. DorrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  2. Territory of Washington ex rel. Kelly v. StewartWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Chapman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
  4. State ex rel. Hemen v. City of BallardWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Drum v. University Place Water DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pierce County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Pierce County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. McKenzie v. Mukilteo Water DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. State v. LunaWashington Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API