Legal Opinion

Schlager v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 28, 1991No. 13-90-033-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEERDEN, Justice.

This is a suit on a promissory note. Peter Schlager sued John Harris to collect on a note executed by Harris, payable to Schlager. Trial was to the court, and at the conclusion of Schlager’s case, the court granted judgment for Harris. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

Schlager alleged in his pleadings that he was the owner and holder of a promissory note that Harris had executed in the amount of $18,000.00 plus interest, that the note was due on February 28, 1987, that *894Harris had not paid the note, and that Schlager had made presentment and demand on Harris to pay…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Qantel Business Systems, Inc. v. Custom Controls Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Southwestern Fire & Casualty Company v. LarueTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Gonzalez v. Nielson, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
  4. Chase Commercial Corp. v. Datapoint Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  5. Twin City Bowling Lanes, Inc. v. CIT CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Escalante v. Luckie, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2002
  2. Andrews v. Sullivan, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  3. Andrews, Clarence & Zella Andrews v. Charles E. Sullivan D/B/A Charles E. Sullivan Realty, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  4. Jorge Escalante v. D. D. Luckie and Harry K. Myers, Jr., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2002
  5. Pamela Bodoin v. Diversified Financial Systems, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API