Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Sullivan

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided April 18, 2002No. 13-99-512-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by Assigned

Justice MAURICE AMIDEI.

This is an appeal from an adverse judgment following a jury verdict in a suit on an earnest money contract and for fraud to recover a real estate broker’s commission.

Appellee, Sullivan Realty, orally contracted with Clarence and Zella Andrews, appellants, to find a buyer to purchase the Andrews’ motor inn for a purchase price of $390,000; Sullivan was to receive a four percent real estate commission. Thereafter, Sullivan obtained a written earnest money contract and $5,000 earnest money from the Patel brothers expressly providing for a four…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Castleberry v. BranscumTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Island Recreational Development Corp. v. Republic of Texas Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Englander Co. v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Koral Industries v. Security-Connecticut Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lake v. Premier Transportation, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2008
  2. Reservoir Systems, Inc. v. TGS-NOPEC Geophysical Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  3. A.M. Barbar Corporation D/B/A A+ Transmission Specialists and Stephen D. Peoples v. Walter Hellriegel, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2006
  4. Bank of America, N.A. v. Jerry L. Barth, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2013
  5. Exxon Corp. v. Makofski Ex Rel. Makofski, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API