Legal Opinion

Pamela Bodoin v. Diversified Financial Systems, L.P.

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided November 6, 1996No. 03-96-00075-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-96-00075-CV

Pamela Bodoin, Appellant

v.

Diversified Financial Systems, L.P., Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 261ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 446,335, HONORABLE JOHN K. DIETZ, JUDGE PRESIDING

2Per curiam

Pamela Bodoin appeals from a judgment that she owed Diversified Financial Systems, L.P. ("the Partnership") under two promissory notes. Bodoin contends that the Partnership did not properly or sufficiently prove entitlement to payment or the proper amount due on the notes. We will affirm the judgment.

BACKGROUND

The evidence at trial consisted…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Holt Atherton Industries, Inc. v. HeineTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Guaranty Federal Savings Bank v. Horseshoe Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API