Mastrom, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
The dispositive question on appeal is whether damages caused by fraudulent investment activities of Mastrom, the insured, were covered under an accountant’s professional liability policy as damages “arising out of the performance of professional services for others in the insured’s capacity as an accountant or notary public.” We conclude that this policy language does not cover the conduct alleged, and affirm the judgment dismissing the action.
I
Mastrom, Inc. did business providing a range of accounting, tax, and financial management services, primarily to doctors and dentists.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Maddox v. Colonial Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Jamestown Mut. Ins. Co. v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Bancroft v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Durham City Bd. of Educ. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of PittsburghCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Wm. C. Vick Construction Co. v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1999
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Vigilant Ins. Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1989
- Peerless Insurance v. StrotherDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1990
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. DannenfeldtDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.