Legal Opinion

Peerless Insurance v. Strother

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided June 21, 1990No. 87-91-CIV-3PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

TERRENCE WILLIAM BOYLE, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court upon the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs, general liability insurers, brought this declaratory judgment action to establish that they have no duty to defend nor indemnify the defendants in an action filed by the United States for the recovery of environmental cleanup costs. The defendants assert that the plaintiffs must fulfill these obligations under the comprehensive general liability (“CGL”) policies at issue. The court now considers these motions. 1

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Defendant, Carolina…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Waste Management of Carolinas, Inc. v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. C. D. Spangler Construction Co. v. Industrial Crankshaft & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Paul J. Mraz v. Canadian Universal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  4. Garland P. Stout v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  5. Ames v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. West American Insurance Co. v. Tufco Flooring East, IncCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Village of Morrisville Water & Light Department v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, D. Vermont · 1991
  3. Harford County v. Harford Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Ala. Plating v. US Fidelity and Guar.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  5. Wm. C. Vick Construction Co. v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API