Legal Opinion

Arkansas Valley Bank v. Kelley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 27, 1928PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

At the trial from which this appeal comes the court made a finding- of fact which presents the issues in the case. "Without reciting the testimony, it may be said that the finding of fact is largely in accord with the undisputed testimony, and," as to any matters about which there was a conflict, is supported -by substantial testimony. We -therefore assume the facts tó be as found by the court. ' This finding is as follows:

“During the season of 1925 H. J. Payne acted as agent for Leigh Kelley for the sale of the latter’s potatoes, under a verbal contract, by the terms of which Payne was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. National Bank v. BurkhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Stephens v. . Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Merchants' National Bank v. Nichols & Shepard Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Hatch v. Fourth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Baldwin v. . BurrowsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fort Smith v. United States Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  2. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. Pittsburg Pipe & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Taylor v. Dierks Lumber Coal CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  4. Runyan v. Community Fund of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  5. Omaha Hardwood Lumber Co. v. J. H. Phipps Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API