Legal Opinion

Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. Pittsburg Pipe & Supply Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 7, 1939No. 3883PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Chief Justice.

Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Company, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, instituted this action in the District Court of Gregg County, Texas, against Pittsburg Pipe &' Supply Company, hereinafter called Supply Company, I. G. Futoransky, hereinafter called Futoransky, and Charles E. Wair. Plaintiff sued as the assignee of the First National Bank of Longview, Texas. It sought recovery of the sum of $2,020, alleging this amount was the amount paid by its assignor on two forged checks drawn against the account of Vivian Church and paid therefrom by its said assignor,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Winnsboro v. First Nat. Bank of QuitmanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  2. First National Bank v. TallyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Rouvant v. San Antonio National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. v. Beaumont Cadillac Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Eardley Bros. v. BurtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McDowell v. Dallas Teachers Credit Union, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  2. Bankers Protective Life Ins. Co. v. AddisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Spolane v. CoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. The Riggs National Bank of Washington, D. C., Etc. v. Dade Federal Savings and Loan Association of Miami, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  5. Pair v. Caraway Drilling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API