Caher v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.

The expulsion of Caher for non-payment of his fare, at a place other than a passenger station, was illegal (P. S., a. 160, s. 6; Baldwin v. Railway, 64 N. H. 596); but it does not follow as a matter of course that the defendant is liable for the damage which was thereafter suffered. Caher could not complain that he was not permitted to stay on the train. He had no such right. His right was to be provided with passenger station accommodations when ejected, and this is the only right which the defendant invaded. The failure to provide him passenger station accommodations is the only wrong with…