Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Burgess Sulphite Fibre Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 6, 1904PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

On the afternoon of April 9, 1899, the plaintiff’s intestate, Reynolds, was killed in the defendant’s engine room. Reynolds was an assistant engineer whose duty it was to assist the principal engineer, Rankin, in operating several of the defendant’s engines. He had been at work in this capacity for about twenty days, and liad had considerable experience as a locomotive engineer. He was regarded as a competent man for the work. On the day of the accident, a few minutes before six o’clock, he was found lying on the floor, with his head between the governor wheel of an engine and the crank case,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gahagan v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1900
  2. Deschenes v. Concord & Montreal RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1897
  3. Cohn v. SaidelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902
  4. Dame v. Laconia Car Co. WorksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902
  5. Huntress v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Neal v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Gage v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
  3. Eisentrager v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  4. Ingerson v. Grand Trunk RailwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919
  5. Theobald v. ShepardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API