Legal Opinion

Saunders v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 4, 1927PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.

The plaintiff was employed to operate a one-man car upon the defendant’s electric street railway, running out of Portsmouth. He claims to have suffered a rupture while lifting with others, in tilting a car to release one Rollins, a pedestrian, who had been run upon and wedged beneath the wheel guard.

The accident occurred on March 20, 1923. The action is subject-to the provision of section 2 of the employers’ liability, act (Laws 1911-, c. 163), there being no evidence that the defendant had filed a declaration under section 3 thereof. Spilene v. Company, 79 N. H. 326. Assumption of the risks…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Danforth v. FisherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908
  2. Gage v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
  3. Gahagan v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1900
  4. Derosier v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
  5. Deschenes v. Concord & Montreal RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1897

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Williams v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  2. Lovett v. Manchester Street RailwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932
  3. Reed v. Nashua Buick Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929
  4. Fasekis v. J. J. Newbury Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1945
  5. Paul R. Fernberg, etc.s. v. T.F. Boyle Transportation Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API