Legal Opinion

Vassillion v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 7, 1946No. 3583PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

Although the defendants contend that the case of Mandell v. Company, ante, 1, is not decisive of the present case, a matter hereinafter considered, their principal argument has consisted of an attempt to show that that case was unwisely decided and should not be applied “in the decision of this or other cases coming before this Court.” The argument upon this point has been so solemnly and so vigorously pressed that we have taken occasion to re-examine the grounds of our decision in the Mandell case with the following result.

The controversy involves the interpretation of P. L., c. 101, s. 9,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  2. Flynn v. GordonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
  3. Vidal v. ErrolSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932
  4. Brember v. JonesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1892
  5. Osgood v. MaxwellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hardwick Ex Rel. Bartz v. BublitzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  2. Bagley v. Controlled Environment Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  3. Dunbeck v. Exeter & Hampton Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  4. Treisman v. KamenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  5. Emery v. BoothSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API