Legal Opinion

Maylie v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1992No. Civ. 81-1964PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.

This is an action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 51 et seq., for personal injuries that plaintiff Robert J. Maylie, Jr., suffered while in the employ of defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK). After the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $2,567,259.60, defendant moved for a new trial under Rule 59(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons explained below, I will deny that motion, provided that plaintiff agrees to remittitur of $1,466,000.

I. Facts and Procedural History

This…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. LiepeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. PfeiferSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Dan Lind v. Schenley Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  4. Eichel v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Celia Gumbs and James Gumbs v. Pueblo International, Inc. D/B/A Pueblo Supermarkets. Appeal of Pueblo International, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Drysdale v. WoerthDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Borrell v. Bloomsburg UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Baker v. John Morrell & Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003
  4. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  5. Mycogen Plant Science, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API