Legal Opinion
In Re J.P. Morgan Chase Cash Balance Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 30, 2006No. 06 Civ. 732(HB)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
BAER, District Judge:
Neil Aldoroty, John J. Berotti, Annette Marie Falchetti, Terri Melli, Norman J. Schomaker, and Perry Shapiro (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) allege that the JPMorgan Chase Retirement Plan (“Plan”) implemented by JPMorgan Chase (“JPMC”) violates the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et. seq. In Count I, the Plaintiffs allege that the JPMC Plan is age discriminatory. Plaintiffs have withdrawn Count II (“backload-ing,” i.e. postponing benefits) 1 and Count III (“forfeiture”) 2 without prejudice and reserve…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- BedRoc Limited, LLC v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hirt v. Equitable Retirement Plan for Employees, Managers & AgentsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Amara v. Cigna Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Drutis v. Rand McNally & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- In Re Citigroup Pension Plan ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- In re J.P. Morgan Chase Cash Balance LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.