Legal Opinion

State v. Chakerian

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 31, 1995No. C93-07-34971; CA A83155 (Control); C93-07-34975; CA A83173; C93-07-34970; CA A83174; C93-07-34972; CA A83175; C93-07-34973; CA A83176PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

The state appeals, seeking reversal of orders that allowed defendants’ demurrers to charges of riot. The trial court concluded that the statute underlying those charges, ORS 166.015, is unconstitutionally overbroad. We reverse and remand.

Defendants were charged, in a single indictment, with violating the anti-rioting statute, ORS 166.015. They demurred, asserting, inter alia, that (1) ORS 166.015 is unconstitutional in that it is directed to the content of expression and does not fall within any historically recognized exception to the free speech protections of Article I, section 8, of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. MoyleOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. PlowmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. GravesOregon Supreme Court · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ChakerianOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. City of Springfield v. KellimCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  4. State v. CroweCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API