Legal Opinion

In Re Hanenberg

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 2010No. 20090135PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

777 N.W.2d 62 (2010)

2010 ND 8

In the Matter of James K. HANENBERG

Cass County State's Attorney, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

James K. Hanenberg, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 20090135.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

January 12, 2010.

Birch P. Burdick, State's Attorney, Fargo, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee.

Richard E. Edinger, Fargo, N.D., for defendant and appellant.

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] James Hanenberg appeals a district court's order involuntarily committing him as a sexually dangerous individual. He argues the State did not prove by clear and convincing evidence that he has serious difficulty…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Feland v. A.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reierson v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Agnes M. Gassmann Revocable Living Trust v. ReichertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Interest of GehlhoffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API